May 18, 2012

Arizona Will Not Regulate Medical Marijuana Strength

In most states in the United States where medical marijuana is legal, the state or a state agency regulates the dispensaries. This is to be certain that the strength of the drug is consistent and the quality is safe for people taking it for medical purposes. In Arizona, where medical marijuana was just recently legalized and set to become available in 2011, there are no plans to regulate it.

The Argument
Officials in Arizona argue that it is critical to know the drug’s country of origin and whether or not pesticides were used in the process. They do not place the same importance on the strength of each plant. Measuring the amount of THC is a tedious and costly process that they do not deem necessary or practical to the process. There is a lot of variation even in plants that were grown in identical environments. Arizona’s Department of Health is just not deciding on some basic regulations for when the drug becomes available to patients with prescriptions in March 2011.

The Plan
Proposition 203 set the plan into motion for Arizona to legalize medical marijuana. Arizona has laid out some guidelines. Approved dispensaries of medical marijuana will need to have a medical director on their staff to handle any issues and handle patients’ questions. Medical doctors must see a patient regularly in order to prescribe marijuana as part of treatment. Buyers must carry identification cards. Growers will need to pass security measures set by the state and meet certain guidelines about how the plant is grown.

Rules About Usage
Patients must smoke in their homes or in their yards, there will be laws barring them from smoking medical marijuana in public places. Officials do say that patients would be able to find other methods, such as ingesting the drug, to take a dose when they are not at home.

Census Signals Trouble for Obama

WASHINGTON - JANUARY 20:   President Barack Ob...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife

The results of the 2010 United States Census could spell trouble for Obama’s 2012 presidential reelection campaign.

Shifting Numbers
The 435 districts that elect members to the House of Representatives are reapportioned based on census results and shifts in the population. This allows them to continue to represent approximately equal numbers of citizens. Population shifts also signal changes in the electoral college which elects the new president of the United States every four years. Shifts in the population can be drastic game changers.

Wins and Losses
The largest population gains in 2010 came in Texas, a Republican stronghold. Texas will pick up an estimated four new seats in the House. The states who lost the largest number of people and will lose seats were New York and Ohio. These states both went to Obama in 2008. Overall, states in the north and Midwest are losing populations and therefore, losing political influence. The largest population gains are coming in the south, states that are traditionally republican strongholds and stand to pick up political influence over the next several years. It remains to be seem whether or not population shifts will also cause some shifts in the patterns of the electoral college. Huge shifts would be necessary to make it so that states in the south could go Democratic in the presidential election.

State Governors
2010 midterm elections have already caused some potential problems for Obama’s reelection bid. Republican governors will be in place in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This means people who can help to bring out the vote and offer their backing for a Republican candidate in 2012. Having a state governor’s support can be a big advantage to a presidential candidate. This is especially true when presidential races are close, and in recent years, races have always been close.

The Case For and Against Sarah Palin in 2012

With 2010 midterm elections behind the United States, all eyes are on the Republican Party and who will be the 2012 presidential candidate to take on President Barack Obama in his bid for reelection. One of the most talked about options is former Vice Presidential candidate and former Alaska governor Sarah Palin.

Gauging the Media
All eyes have been on Palin and her family this year. Following Bristol Palin’s run on Dancing with the Stars, the Palin family has appeared in a series of reality programming on The Learning Channel. Focused on living in Alaska, outdoor adventures, and of course, a platform for Palin’s political opinions, the series has enjoyed good ratings for the first several episodes. Palin continues to write and to make the media circuit discussing politics. Whether she plans on a career in commentary or a run for the White House, she’s certainly getting more than her share of attention.

Looking at the Polls
Although she is still the darling of the far right, one poll revealed that 59% of the American public claims that they would never vote for Palin for President. Still, it’s difficult to imagine that staunch Republican voters would stay home if it came down to a vote for Palin or a win for Obama. These poll numbers and public distaste have drawn comparisons between Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton, whose political aspirations often received similar poll ratings and negative press. Many commentators have considered that the American public tends to be more polarized when it comes to female candidates.

Does She Even Want to Run?
Looking at her recent career choices and statements, it is highly likely that Palin does not plan to make a run for the presidency. Frankly, she seems content in her current lifestyle and it is likely that other Republican candidates will surface who Palin can support without running herself. For 59% of America, that’s just fine.